Ta-Nehisi Coates joins the Black4Palestine Deception
For nearly 60 years, the exploitation playbook has been the same
With widely read books such as Between the World and Me and The Case for Reparations, Ta-Nehisi Coates is a well-known author within the Black, social justice space. In his latest work The Message, Coates delves into the Arab-Israeli conflict and further reveals the same flawed, ill-informed thinking that has characterized the KGB-imported Black4Palestine movement since its inception in the 1960s.
From Coates’ website:
Finally, in the book’s longest section, Coates travels to Palestine, where he sees with devastating clarity how easily we are misled by nationalist narratives, and the tragedy that lies in the clash between the stories we tell and the reality of life on the ground.
The most ironic part of this quote is that Coates is the one being “misled by (Arab) nationalist narratives” the way so many Black American thinkers before him like James Baldwin, Malcolm X, and anti-Zionist-turned-Zionist Eldridge Cleaver. These pro-Palestinian/anti-Israel historical figures within the Black American political and intellectual class stood in stark contrast to the Israel/peace-supporting Dr. King, Bayard Rustin, and A. Philip Randolph. It is important to note that, in the same way that Baldwin, Malcolm, and (initially) Cleaver got the Palestinian issue so wrong in the 1960s, Black people like Coates, Marc Lamont Hill, and Cornel West get it wrong today. While much can be said in analyzing the Black4Palestine delusion (I write about it in my book Zionism & the Black Church), it can be briefly stated in two points:
The Arab Palestinians’ true oppressors are their leaders (Hamas and the PLO), not Israel.
Black solidarity with the Arabs of the Palestinian Territories (and against Israel) necessarily ignores the millions of Black Africans slaughtered and enslaved by Arabs throughout the region today — for centuries.
Admittedly, I have not read Coates’ The Message. But based on both his own and others’ descriptions, I can confidently state there will be no genuine discussion of either of the two points listed above. Within the Black4Palestine campaign, there rarely is.
I offer these quotes from a recent New York Magazine article The Return of Ta-Nehisi Coates as evidence:
Our own age of strife takes Coates to three places: Dakar, Senegal, where he makes a pilgrimage to Gorée Island and the Door of No Return; Chapin, South Carolina…and the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
Coates is interested in patterns of domination, in how oppression replicates itself in different contexts, and in the “related traumas of colonialism and enslavement,” as he writes in his essay on Dakar, a beautiful, searching examination of how his racial consciousness has evolved over time and across space. “I knew slavery and Jim Crow, and they knew conquest and colonialism,” he writes of the Senegalese. The kinship he feels with the Palestinians has similar origins: “I felt the warmth of solidarity of ‘conquered peoples,’ as one of my comrades put it, finding each other across the chasm of oceans and experience,” he writes.
There are so many African slaves to Arab masters in Libya that one African Union representative called Libya “the new Gore’e Slave Market.” Coates did not travel to and comment on Libya. “Oppression” and “enslavement” are what Nigerian Christians are experiencing as some 6,000 are slaughtered each year by Islamic terrorists such as Boko Haram or the Fulani Herdsman. As Nigerian Stephen Enada explained in Newsweek:
When African children and women are killed in their sleep, teenage girls sexually trafficked across the Mediterranean, and young boys kidnapped for use as child soldiers, there is no global response. Terrorism is planned, funded, and executed by terrorists and their global networks.
Enada then asked:
Why are there no reports analyzing funders and planners of terrorist murder in Nigeria, of genocidal assaults in Africa?
Coates did not travel to and comment on Nigeria.
After the Hamas massacre of some 1,200 Israelis on October 7, 2023, former Sudanese slave Simon Deng wrote a piece for Tablet Magazine entitled First They Came for My People, Then They Came for the Jews.
What Hamas did was precisely like what Arab Sudan’s genocidal government did to my people. Since they invaded Africa in the seventh century, Arab Muslims had always been doing jihad. We will never really know many Blacks have died between then and today. It is one of those numbers which, because it is unknown, proves how huge the suffering must be.
Coates did not travel to and comment on Sudan. He did not “[feel] the warmth of solidarity of ‘conquered peoples’” under any Arab imperialist regime. He was not “interested in patterns of domination, [or] how oppression replicates itself in different contexts” when it came to the 1400-year-long Arab enslavement of Africans. Like the misled who have come before him, his sympathies have been manipulated toward what he perceives as anti-colonial, anti-Western, or anti-White movements. This is how Yasser Arafat and the PLO repackaged the Nazi-inspired determination to destroy the Jewish state of Israel. Recast the Israeli Jews as White settler colonizers and Western imperialists; never mind the fact that Zionism is the liberation movement of the Jewish people or the fact that over 50% of Israel’s Jewish population fled the Arabized/Islamized countries of North Africa and the Middle East. Coates’ insistence that Israel is oppressing Arab Palestinians is a prescribed, Marxist binary of oppressed vs. oppressor. It ignores both the wealthy and exploitative Arab regimes in power (Hamas’ surviving leaders are worth $11 billion) and the true suffering in the region.
In his critique of Ta-Nehisi Coates’ newfound Palestine cause, Unherd’s Ralph Leonard touches on one additional aspect of the Black4Palestine travesty.
The irony is that before the Seventies, black American writers, activists & intellectuals such as W.E.B. Du Bois, Bayard Rustin and Paul Robeson would have said the same thing [that Coates says about Palestine], but [said it] about the Zionist cause. Many black nationalists, from Edward Wilmot Blyden to Marcus Garvey, made analogies between the Zionist project to “return” the Jews to Zion and their own “back to Africa” schemes.
Africa-Israel Weekly published an academic article by Professor Ansel Brown of North Carolina Central University (an HBCU) entitled Zionism and Pan-Africanism: A Common Journey to Recapture Ethnic Self-Realization. The Institute for Black Solidarity with Israel (IBSI) also produced a video based on Professor Brown’s work. As the saying goes, there are so many receipts that refute the Black4Palestine hypocrisy, that one must be diligent to ignore them.
Finally, IBSI officially launched its in-person Forum on Israel, Africa, & Black America this month in Washington, DC. In the Forum, we delve deeply into issues like the historic Black4Palestine movement and how it is the opposite of the true legacy of both spiritual and political Zionism in the Black community. In 2025, the live Forum on Israel, Africa, & Black America will be presented in cities across the country. You can visit IBSI.org/dates for the live Forum schedule (available beginning in December), or email info@IBSI-Now.org for more details including how you can host a Forum in your area.
I read many books on these topics, eg Christopher Simpson, John Loftus, currently reading one by Rochelle Saidel. The jist is that the US Department of State is ratlined-nazi territory, full of third reich rescuers and sympathizers. Full of people (now disciples) that engaged in money laundering and financial sponsorship of the 3rd Reich.
Great men such as Charles R. Allen that worked *against* this were typically called 'communists', whether they were communists or not. And there were leaders of organizations that worked against this that *were* openly communist. And of course the US government made HUGE efforts in the 50s and 60s to root out communism wherever it existed, but no such effort was made to root out the nazi rot in the US government, whereby men that had lead pogroms against Jews in Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus and elsewhere were welcomed to the US--all while this government that welcomed them taught the rest of us that 'communism' was the danger to us.
But this feeds into my current point: West and Marc Lamont Hill are not dumb or deceived. They are on the take from our nazi establishment. The Israel issue is the easiest to see who will compromise their integrity to get paid, to be featured in US media as a 'left wing freedom fighter'. But this is not any Soviet plot against us. It is a plot and policy of our own leaders.
You are such a breathe of fresh air. Strange that now that the BD in BDS have failed to Biden admin is sanctioning Israeli citizens. One woman simply protested supplying Gazans with food and medicines while her son is risking his life in the very same place! She cannot access her bank account nor can her husband.
We need more voices of sanity like yours.